MEXICO'S METEOROLOGICAL EXPERT ON 03-05-04 CONDITIONS
These are the statements made by Alberto Hernandez Unzon
yesterday (May 17th), during an interview on television about the Mexican
Air Force UFO case.
Engineer in Geophysics Alberto Hernandez is sub-manager of the
National Meteorological Services, Mexico's official
meteorological center. He is also a Member of the Scientific
Advisory Comitee of the National System for Civil Protection,
and Member of the Hurricane Committee of the Worldwide
Meteorological Association.
Question: Alberto, you made the National Meteorological Service's
complete study of the March 5, 2004 meteorological conditions
over the Campeche area. What are the results?
Answer: According to the satellite images, the conditions
registered in the observatories and the satellite RADAR images,
there were stable conditions in the entire Campeche zone. In the
specific area of interest in this issue, there were cloud
formations and some stratus clouds that are stable conditions for
this season.
There were no rains registered and the cloud type was very
stable as we can see in these satellite images and the Air Force
video.
Question: There have been some statements pointing that there
were flash-lightning conditions in the area at that time. What
were the conditions at that time?
Answer: Meteorologically speaking, a lightning flash is of a
short duration and short intensity. That's the basic definition.
We have all witnessed an electrical storm at sometime. Special
conditions are required for an electrical storm - big, vertical
clouds and a completely unstable atmosphere, ionization in the
atmosphere and the meteorological systems that create that type
of cloud.
Question: That means that the meteorological conditions were not
suitable for lightning that day over Campeche and therefore
contradicts what the UNAM scientists claimed in their report?
Answer: Yes. On March 5, we were entering into the final stage
of the winter season. The meteorological conditions in this
season are of cold fronts but that day in particular there were
none present. What we had were the type of clouds that do not
cause the flash phenomena.
Question: Did the scientists from the UNAM approach the National
Meteorological Services to request the meteorological conditions
over Campeche to support their theory?
Answer: No, they have never approached us at any time. If they
are talking about a meteorological phenomena at that location,
they should have met with us at the National Meteorological
Services to obtain the meteorological conditions just like your
team, as well as journalists did.
There were no weather ballons sent up in that area.
Question: What's the duration of a flash of lightning.
Answer: A flash lasts microseconds. We cannot talk even of one
or two seconds because it's just a single discharge. To say that
these lights on the video are ball lighting or electrical sparks
is nonsense.
I repeat, that day there were no meteorological conditions for
flash or ball lightning in the entire Campeche area. The clouds
must have been at approximately 7 kilometers high therefore what
we see are stable stratus cloud formations.
Question: What could we be seeing here in this video.
Answer: If this is an optical phenomenon it cannot be refered to
Meteorology. It is not a photo meteor, it is not a litho meteor.
They are not ice crystals nor a St. Elmo's fire. Those are all
meteorological phenomena. And this is not a mirage phenomena.
In conclusion, we do not have an explanation to this phenomena.
There are satellites Aqua and Terra and we can request NASA to
send us images of that day to continue this study and get more
information to try to find out what could have happened that
day.
UFOINFO would like to thank Santiago Yturria and UFO UpDates for granting permission to use this article. To keep up to date with follow-up reports and discussions you are advised to subscribe to UFO UpDates by writing to Errol Bruce-Knapp at: ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net
| Sight Unseen : Science, UFO Invisibility and Transgenic Beings - Budd Hopkins, Carol Rainey ...In Sight Unseen, Budd Hopkins and coauthor Carol Rainey show how fascinating discoveries in modern science support the plausibility of the UFO phenomenon.
Featuring sixteen never-before-published cases, Sight Unseen probes two newly uncovered patterns in alien abduction: cases of UFO 'invisibility' and reports of genetically altered alien beings who interact with humans during their routine lives.
The 'invisibility' accounts detailed by Hopkins include numerous daylight abductions in densely populated urban areas -- all apparently unseen and accomplished through a technology of invisibility... |
|
Top |